Responsible Growth

20 Years Together Working for Clean Water

20 Years Together Working for Clean Water

Mobile Baykeeper has succeeded all these years, however, because of your willingness to get involved when asked, write a check when it was needed, and speak up and get engaged on the issues that mean the most to you. We will continue to make a difference because of your continued involvement and investment in our work.

Proposed Rule Threatens Important Protections for Wetlands and Creeks

Proposed Rule Threatens Important Protections for Wetlands and Creeks

A proposed rule change was announced today that would strip the Clean Water Act of important protections. Allowing this proposed rule change would let industrial facilities, sewage plants, and developers impact many previously protected creeks and fill wetlands without restrictions, harming our local economy and way of life.

Lagoon on Dauphin Island Threatened

Dauphin Island is a charming town nestled between Mobile Bay and the Gulf. As this fragile island continues to develop we must make thoughtful decisions to ensure the treasured heritage of the island is passed on for future generations to enjoy.

Currently a proposed development threatens the island. The developer plans to build condominiums, and a large commercial marina in Aloe Bay. This project, planned on a fragile undeveloped shallow bay, will destroy wetlands and fill in water bottoms home to several important species. After reviewing the proposal and talking with community members, Mobile Baykeeper is urging the Corps to DENY this proposal.

Community Speaks Up on Corps’ Ship Channel Study

Community Speaks Up on Corps’ Ship Channel Study

Mobile Baykeeper submitted a comment letter on the study released by the Corps on the Mobile Ship Channel expansion project. The letter was on behalf of Mobile Baykeeper’s 4,500 members, Board, the Peninsula of Mobile, and Conservation Alabama. Hundreds of community members, several community groups, and local scientists also submitted their own comment letters. The common thread among the letters was the need for the Corps to address major flaws in the study to ensure our natural resources are protected.

Mobile Baykeeper Submits Comments on the Mobile Ship Channel Expansion Study

On July 27, 2018 the Draft Supplementary Environmental Impact Statement (DSEIS) was released by The Army Corps of Engineers. The Public Comment Period will now be open for 45 days. Mobile Baykeeper looks forward to reviewing and submitting additional comments over the coming weeks as we research how our concerns were taken into account following our earlier comments.

Mobile Baykeeper Submits Comments on Mobile Ship Channel Expansion Study

Mobile Bay is our home - a place where we all enjoy swimming, fishing, and playing. It is also a complex and highly sensitive ecosystem that is considered one of the most biodiverse in North America. We depend on a healthy Mobile Bay for many things: recreation, delicious seafood, tourism, coastal development, industry, and so much more.


Therefore, Mobile Baykeeper is staying heavily involved in plans to deepen and widen the Mobile Ship Channel. By thoroughly studying and developing a comprehensive plan for the port expansion, we can grow responsibly and minimize negative impacts to the very natural resources that support many economic sectors and our quality of life along the coast.

Mobile Baykeeper recently submitted comments in advance of the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (DSEIS) due to be published later this summer evaluating the proposed deepening and widening of the Mobile Ship Channel. A summary of our latest comments are below. We ask the Army Corps of Engineers do the following:

  • Better Define and Understand “No Action” – We are troubled that the Corps has thus far stated there will be  “no environmental impacts” associated with this project. We now understand this finding is in part based on predicting ship traffic will be greater without the ship channel deepening and widening project than once it is built - that is a tenuous assumption. We request the Corps review impacts under a variety of scenarios to accurately understand what impacts will occur under these all potential growth scenarios. For example, if ships are able to be more heavily loaded (because the channel is deeper) how will this impact the wake height experienced along the western shorelines of Mobile Bay.

  • Use More than One Year as a Baseline – The Corps is using weather patterns from 2010 as the only year to develop a model for the entire project. The year of 2010 did not have severe or extreme drought and is likely not an accurate characterization of the full range of conditions that would result from the modifications to the ship channel. We strongly believe they should use more than one single year to create a more accurate model.

  • Evaluate Alternatives - We suggest the Corps look at alternatives proposals including the implementation of a Vessel Speed Reduction (VSR) program that may reduce project impacts from ship wake (causing erosion to shorelines and disturbing oyster spat settling) and air emissions (degrading air quality) through a reduced speed requirement of all vessels in the channel.

  • Cumulative & Indirect Impacts – Cumulative impacts include those coming from affiliated industries that will need or wish to expand due to the Port’s expansion as well as prospective new growth due to a deeper and wider ship channel. The cumulative analysis needs be sensitive enough to include other important factors including but not limited to: extreme weather events, pollution, wetland loss, fishery habitat impacts, and sea level rise. The Corps must identify all indirect impacts such as new growth and development, and compensate for any unavoidable impacts.

  • Coordinate with All Appropriate Audiences – The Corps should meaningfully coordinate with all the appropriate audiences to develop the DSEIS – including state and federal agencies, commercial and recreational fishermen, and minority and low-income communities located in affected areas. To ensure the Corps is utilizing the best available science, they must also connect with the local scientists and researchers who specialize in subjects that are relevant and pertain directly to the study. These individuals have extensive and critical information.

  • Monitoring Plans & Mitigation – We suggest the Corps implement a long-term monitoring plan that closely evaluates the impacts of dredging and disposal areas for at least 10 years. We encourage them to consider public comments to ensure impacts are not underestimated. If any unavoidable impacts are identified, we suggest the Corps work with the community and environmental groups to ensure mitigation projects will adequately fix the impacts identified and are supported by the community.


Mobile Baykeeper also provided more specific concerns that we want them to study at length:

  • Changes to saltwater and dissolved oxygen (after creating a deeper channel) impacting...

  • Wetlands productivity and survival

  • Submerged Aquatic Vegetation (SAVs) or seagrasses

  • Fish and benthic species from habitat loss or changes to water characteristics

  • Increased ship wake and wave height causing...

  • Shoreline erosion

  • Oyster spat settling and oyster farming viability

  • Current and future living shorelines

  • Potential mammal ship strikes

  • Disturbance of mammal and fish species migrations

  • Dredging activities and a deeper channel causing...

  • Turbidity (or muddy water) which can impact SAVs, oysters, and fish

  • Release of harmful contaminants locked in the bottom substrate

  • Causing direct mortality or disturbance to benthic communities (critters that live on the bottom bay floor)

**And how all of these activities will impact our Threatened and Endangered Species like the West Indian Manatee and Gulf Sturgeon, etc.

Ultimately, we encourage the Corps select a plan that addresses the triple bottom line - the economy, environment, and community. Benefiting all three of these values will continue to allow Mobile Bay to thrive and continue to support its many uses. If you want to dive deeper into our full comment letter, please click here.

Submit comments – You still have a chance to speak up! You can submit written comments via email to On July 27, The Corps released a Draft Supplementary Environmental Impact Statement with a 45 day comment period, so be sure to follow Mobile Baykeeper for updates on this important document.

Join us

Become a Member of Mobile Baykeeper to receive more information about our involvement in this issue and other important issues we're working on to protect the Mobile Bay Watershed and our coastal communities. 

Contact Us

Questions, comments, or concerns? Let us know! Contact Program & Grants Coordinator Laura Jackson at or call (251)-433-4229

Back to Basics Workshop on BP Oil Spill Restoration

Back to Basics Workshop on BP Oil Spill Restoration

The Deepwater Horizon Trustee Council is hosting a back to basics, in-depth discussion on restoration on Wednesday, July 18th. This workshop will teach you how the Trustees, as well as our state and federal agencies are working to restore the Gulf with oil spill funding.

Weighing the Pros and Cons of BP Projects Selected for Alabama

Weighing the Pros and Cons of BP Projects Selected for Alabama

The Alabama RESTORE Council recently selected more than $300 million in BP Projects for Coastal Alabama. While we're glad to see many of the projects that were selected, we also feel there was a lot of money that could have been used elsewhere. 

Mobile Baykeeper Comments on Proposed Wetland Fill in Dog River Watershed

Wetlands fill both sides of this photo of Dog River. These vital areas protect from storm surge, flooding, shoreline erosion, and stormwater runoff pollution.

We recently submitted comments to the United States Army Corps of Engineers and the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) regarding the application to fill nearly five (5)  acres of wetlands in the Dog River Watershed to expand a housing development.

We have significant concerns with the amount of wetlands proposed to be filled in the Dog River Watershed, a predominantly developed watershed, that faces constant threats from flooding, shoreline erosion, storm surge, stormwater runoff, and other water quality issues.

You can write your own letter here or by scrolling to the end of this blog post. You will also find a copy of Mobile Baykeeper's comments included at the bottom of this page.

Why is this important?

Dog River is a vital resource in Coastal Alabama for many reasons. It is home to both full-time residents and visitors. Its local restaurants serve fresh, delicious seafood that come straight from the river. It serves as a favorite pastime for many families who spend their days swimming, fishing, boating, and playing on the river. The river plays a crucial role to the health and well-being of our community, environment, and economy. For these reasons we have concerns about filling these wetlands.

What has been done?

The Dog River Watershed Management Plan (DRWMP) was recently published by Mobile Bay National Estuary Program. This plan uses scientific analysis and input from all types of stakeholders, residents, businesses, MAWSS, environmental organizations (including Dog River Clearwater Revival and Mobile Baykeeper) and others within the Dog River Watershed to show the issues impacting the watershed. It also provides clear strategies to reduce pollution and improve water quality.

The wetlands proposed to be filled are part of a vital area of wetlands recommended to be preserved by the WMP.

More generally, the WMP recommends acquiring and preserving existing natural wetlands and creating constructed stormwater wetlands...not filling them. The plan states “The overall health of the greater Dog River Watershed depends upon the existence of its wetlands.” And goes on to say that the watershed has suffered from a drastic loss of wetlands and highlights that the greatest loss of wetlands in the Watershed has occurred as a result of filling wetlands for development.

“Although the loss and conversion of habitat is challenging and expensive to reverse, it is critical to protect and preserve remaining areas of ecological significance such as forests, wetlands, and stream floodplains, which provide a natural filter for pollutants, pathogens, sediment, etc. Failure to protect these wetlands, shorelines, marshes, and forests will exacerbate negative impacts described throughout this WMP.”                  

-Dog River Watershed Management Plan

The evidence in the Watershed Management Plan makes it clear why additional wetland fill in the Dog River Watershed will have serious negative effects on water quality and the safety and resilience of communities, infrastructure, and resources located within the watershed.

Mobile Baykeeper's main concerns include:

A map based on National Weather Service models shows storm surge potentials in the Dog River watershed. Filling more wetlands will only make these storm surges more severe.

  • The location of the proposed project is a major concern. The Dog River Watershed is plagued with several issues including flooding, storm surge, shoreline erosion and water quality degradation; any amount of wetland fill will worsen these problems. Furthermore, the proposed wetlands to be filled are considered highly ecologically important to the watershed as a whole.

  • To fill wetlands you must show that there are no other practical alternatives. Houses do not have to be built in wetlands and, in the case of this application, it is clear that the applicant hasn't done everything practical to avoid wetlands.

If this application is approved:

  • Mobile Baykeeper urges the Corps to require the applicant to fund restoration and preservation projects identified within the Dog River WMP to fulfill the mitigation requirements. When wetlands are filled, the developer is required to mitigate (lessen) the harm caused by this wetland fill. The Dog River WMP clearly spells out needed restoration and preservation projects in the watershed. If these wetlands are filled, the harm that is caused by that fill can be lessened, or mitigated, by funding these critical projects.

  • Mitigation should preferentially seek to restore nearby wetlands. Performing required mitigation nearby helps ensure the least negative impact to water quality in the watershed.

  • Appropriate protection measures should be clearly demonstrated to ensure red clay doesn't fill Halls Mill Creek and Dog River during construction. For protection of the watershed and nearby residents, we strongly encourage the incorporation of Low Impact Development practices into the project to the maximum extent.

  • To minimize negative impacts, inspections should be conducted - at least twice a week and after any rainfall of 0.50 inches or greater and a comprehensive plan be created to lay out best management practices and monitoring activities for the project.

In Summary

The Dog River Watershed Management Plan was created to be an active guide for policy makers, watershed resource managers, and decision makers to strategically manage and protect the watershed. We rely on the health and beauty of Dog River for swimming, fishing, boating, delicious seafood, property values, and so much more.  

Mobile Baykeeper urges the Corps to not dismiss the concerted effort made in the WMP and adequately consider it when evaluating this application. Given the above concerns, Mobile Baykeeper recommends denial of this wetland fill application.

Want to write your own letter to encourage these wetlands be protected and not filled?

We've spelled out our main concerns in the pre-drafted letter below. Feel free to edit it until it fits your concerns or just hit send to send your own letter to the Corps and ADEM recommending that they follow the Dog River Watershed Management Plan and protect these important wetlands!

Mobile Baykeeper Submits Comments on Bayou La Batre Sewage Permit

Mobile Baykeeper Submits Comments on Bayou La Batre Sewage Permit

Significant problems have plagued oyster harvesting in Portersville Bay for years and water quality remains a major issue in the area. ADEM now has the opportunity to solve many of the problems facing Portersville Bay and its water quality issues affecting oyster harvesting. This can only take place if ADEM works with other agencies, local businesses – especially the seafood industry and aquaculture – and local citizens and includes all relevant studies and data in the permitting process.

Mobile Baykeeper Submits Comments on Road Projects Affecting Wetlands

Mobile Baykeeper Submits Comments on Road Projects Affecting Wetlands

Mobile Baykeeper recently commented on two road projects proposing to fill wetlands and negatively impact local streams. Across Coastal Alabama, we have lost many of our wetlands and streams due to irresponsible growth, which is why we need you to take action. 

Baykeeper Welcomes Scott Posey

Baykeeper Welcomes Scott Posey

Mobile Baykeeper has been the environmental watchdog, informed voice of reason, and a collaborator for solutions for all issues impacting the Mobile Bay Watershed and our coastal communities for 20 years. We are excited to have Scott Posey on board to forward our mission and our work for Clean Water, Clean Air, and Healthy Communities.

Mobile Baykeeper Comments on Alabama's Air Monitoring Plan

Mobile Baykeeper Comments on Alabama's Air Monitoring Plan

Mobile Baykeeper’s primary focus in commenting on the 2017 Ambient Air Monitoring Plan is safeguarding the health of citizens living in Coastal Alabama. We believe the protection of human health should be the most important factor driving decisions about ambient air monitoring.

Mobile Baykeeper Submits Comments on Map for Mobile

Mobile Baykeeper Submits Comments on Map for Mobile

Today we submitted comments on the Draft Future Land Use Plan, Master Street Plan, and Zoning Code and Subdivision Regulations as part of the Map for Mobile process. We believe these comments contain suggestions, that if implemented, will improve Mobilians' quality of life, protect our environment, and are very much in keeping with Mayor Stimpson's vision of having the "most family friendly city in America by 2020".

7 Years Later: Remembering the Lessons of the BP Oil Disaster

7 Years Later: Remembering the Lessons of the BP Oil Disaster

We must remember the summer of 2010, the loss and the fear we felt deep in our souls and the concerns we all shared so that we never allow ourselves to go back to that world. The world didn’t end in 2010, but neither did our work for Clean Water, Clean Air and Healthy Communities.

Mobile Baykeeper Comments on Millard Maritime Expansion Activities

Mobile Baykeeper Comments on Millard Maritime Expansion Activities

Citizens living on Hollinger's Island are concerned about current operations at Millard Maritime. Concerns include the facilities storage of up to 40,000 tons of fertilizer on the site and the potential for the fertilizer to impact nearby air and water quality.

The facility now plans to expand those operations. Mobile Baykeeper has submitted comments on behalf of our board, officers, staff and more than 4,500 members regarding two separate permits for the expansions proposed by Millard Maritime.

Mobile Baykeeper Submits Comments on Sewer Line Proposed to Go Under Fish River

Mobile Baykeeper Submits Comments on Sewer Line Proposed to Go Under Fish River

Baldwin County Sewer Service is proposing to put a sewage line under the Fish River, a river utilized by many community members to recreate and which ultimately flows into Weeks Bay. Mobile Baykeeper and our members have raised significant concerns with this project. Allowing a sewage line under Fish River, would create the potential for a massive sewage spill. Read more to find out how YOU can get involved.